🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," stated one MEP supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation established by the family of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the local level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various politicians to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that states internationally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.