🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for AI Development

Industry experts said the seeming data breach could boost AI companies searching for material to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and employed illicit tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. He said it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a government proposal to let AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and development told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.